Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Smith v. USA
as 1:2016cv01031
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Colonial Surety Company v. North American Employer Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00427
Plaintiff:
Colonial Surety Company
Defendant:
North American Employer Solutions, LLC, High Country Bank and Larry D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Smith
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02563
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. USA
as 1:2014cv01751
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jacobs et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 1:2013cv02518
Plaintiff:
Dean L. Jacobs and Marcielle S. Jacobs
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. , Ocwen Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sipos et al v. FlightSafety Services Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00552
Defendant:
FlightSafety Services Corporation and Delaware Resource Group of Oklahoma, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Sipos and Gary D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
Smith v. Daniels
as 1:2011cv00848
Petitioner:
Rashad D. Smith
Respondent:
Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. USA
as 1:2009cv01734
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael (I) D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00929
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Smith
Defendant:
OppenheimerFunds, Inc., Oppenhiemer Integrity Funds, Oppenheimer Core Bond Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
