Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael D. Simpson v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv04403
Plaintiff:
Michael D Simpson, individually and as successor-in-interest to JAMAAL MICHAEL SIMPSON, deceased
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALEX VILLANUEVA and Does 1 to 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Fischer v. Dawn T Algers et al
as 2:2013cv00725
Defendant:
Dawn T Algers, Ms Amerilla, Mr Backstressor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael K Fischer
Fischer v. Algers, et. al.
as 2:2012cv02595
Plaintiff:
Michael Fischer
Defendant:
Dawn T. Algers, Paul Elias, Dante Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Prater et al
as 2:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
Malik Jones
Defendant:
C. Prater, D. Simpson, J. L. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Plessas et al
as 2:2009cv02133
Plaintiff:
Malik Jones
Defendant:
C Plessas, T Smith, - Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Felker et al
as 2:2009cv01028
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman
Defendant:
Tom Felker, M.D. McDonald, T. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baptiste v. Dunn et al
as 2:2008cv01420
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Baptiste
Defendant:
G. Dunn, C. Hopson, D. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Wong et al
as 2:2007cv02090
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell
Defendant:
R. Wong, D. Jackson, D. Vanderville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson
as 1:2007at00455
Plaintiff:
Terren D Simpson, SR and Victoria Simpson
Defendant:
Aapex Financial Group Inc, Mike Coen, Jacob Schumaker and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Simpson
as 1:2007cv01304
Plaintiff:
Terren D Simpson, SR and Victoria Simpson
Defendant:
Aapex Financial Group Inc, Mike Coen and Jacob Schumaker
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
