Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Stone v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Kevyn D Stone
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2022cv00882
Petitioner:
Kevyn D Stone
Respondent:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. Labovitz et al
as 3:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Stone and Kevyn D Stone
Defendant:
Eric Labovitz, Dallas County Jail and 396th Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collier v. Dean et al
as 2:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
Brentdrick Demond Collier, Brentdrick Collier and Brent Collier
Defendant:
Abbigal M Dean, Maritssa Franco and Shelly D Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barroso v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2016cv03235
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Correctional Managed Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Stephen et al
as 2:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Joe Carl Valdez, Sr
Defendant:
William Stephen, Norvel Arnold, Warner B Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. 265th Judicial District Courtroom et al
as 3:2015cv02437
Plaintiff:
Kevyn D Stone
Defendant:
Unknown Public Defender and 265th Judicial District Courtroom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Cutrer et al
as 4:2015cv00483
Defendant:
Leon Hailey, Judge Wayne Slyvant, Ken Cutrer and others
Plaintiff:
Kevyn D Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Victoria, Texas et al
as 6:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Mary Frances Jones
Defendant:
City of Victoria, Texas, D. Stone, John Doe, No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stone v. Holton et al
as 4:2011cv00586
Plaintiff:
Russell D Stone
Defendant:
Kim Holton, Jeffery Kelly, Gregory Basham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
