Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Freeman v. Digiorgi
as 3:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C. Freeman
Defendant:
D. W. Digiorgi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. City of Leesburg et al
as 5:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
City of Leesburg, Lake County, Florida, Peyton C. Grinell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Soud et al
as 3:2020cv01312
Defendant:
D. W. Digiorgi, Adrian Soud, Chyna Makarowski and others
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamze v. Braden et al
as 3:2016cv01293
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Bilal Hamze
Defendant:
D. W. Braden, Gilick, Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamze v. Braden et al
as 3:2016cv01217
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Bilal Hamze
Defendant:
D. W. Braden, Gilick, Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradwell v. Ivy et al
as 3:2016cv00943
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Bradwell, III
Defendant:
Shayla T. Ivy , CVS Pharmacies, Chief Executive Officer, CEO and D. W. Digiorgi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2014cv01396
Plaintiff:
Orvel Lloyd
Defendant:
Tommy Seagraves, M. Delacruz, D. Hickox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrams v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Eugene Abrams
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden, Central Florida Reception Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01991
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Davis v. Florida Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00716
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Davis
Defendant:
Florida Dept. of Corrections, Eber Nieves, D. W. McCallum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
