Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Walker et al v. Moldex-Metric, Inc
as 2:2008cv00210
Plaintiff:
Julius D Walker and Judy A Walker
Defendant:
Moldex-Metric, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker et al v. Tyco Healthcare Group LP et al
as 1:2008gd50001
Plaintiff:
John G Walker, John G Walker, John G Walker and others
Defendant:
Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Tyco Healthcare Group LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WALKER v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv66723
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D. WALKER and WAYNE D. WALKER
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALKER v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv66714
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. WALKER and JOHN D. WALKER
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALKER v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60534
Plaintiff:
LLOYD D. WALKER, LLOYD D. WALKER, LLOYD D. WALKER and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALKER v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60618
Plaintiff:
OLIVER D. WALKER, OLIVER D. WALKER, OLIVER D. WALKER and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Walker et al v. Tyco Healthcare Group LP et al
as 1:2007cv00741
Plaintiff:
John G Walker, John G Walker, John G Walker and others
Defendant:
Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Tyco Healthcare Group LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62843
Plaintiff:
GALE D. WALKER and GALE D. WALKER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC., LLOYD E. MITCHELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
