Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Walkins v. Drew et al
as 1:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Walkins
Defendant:
D.B. Drew, M. Stiles, S. Paco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holley v. Drew
as 2:2009cv00591
Petitioner:
Marvin Lee Holley
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walkins v. Drew et al
as 1:2008cv01336
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Walkins
Defendant:
D.B. Drew, M. Sties, S Paco and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burnett et al v. Albany International et al
as 2:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Othre E. Burnett, Emma Jean Barton, Joel Gray and others
Defendant:
Albany International, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Morales v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv00341
Petitioner:
Rafael Calisto Morales
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, D.B. Drew, D Turner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cook v. Drew et al
as 1:2008cv00144
Petitioner:
Gregory Lejuan Cook
Respondent:
D.B. Drew and B Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riley v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv02128
Petitioner:
Elmer Riley
Respondent:
D.B. Drew, C. Ratledge and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Drew
as 1:2007cv02068
Petitioner:
Sydney George Robinson
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Drew
as 1:2007cv01923
Petitioner:
Christopher B Taylor
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv01895
Plaintiff:
Wilmer L. Dixon, III
Defendant:
D.B. Drew and T. Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
