Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Momolu Sirleaf, Jr. v. Amor Correctional Health Serv, et al
as 20-7089
Defendant / Appellee:
Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Eddie Pearson, Warden, GCC, Wright, Captain/Correctional Officer, GCC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., Pharaoh & Priest for the Commonwealth of Israel et al
Momolu Sirleaf, Jr. v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 20-7084
Defendant / Appellee:
Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Correction, Eddie L. Pearson, Warden, GCC, Wright, Captain/Correctional Officer, GCC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., Pharaoh & Priest for the Commonwealth of Israel et al
Sirleaf v. Clarke et al
as 3:2019cv00710
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Captain Wright, D.Y. Kinsley and others
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. CLARKE et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS, D.Y. KINSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf v. Clarke et al
as 8:2019cv02379
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Captain Wright, D.Y. Kinsley and others
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SIRLEAF v. AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02522
Defendant:
AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf, Jr v. Clarke et al
as 3:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. Davide Robinson, Mark E. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks, Jr. v. Dr. Luong et al
as 3:2017cv00804
Plaintiff:
Ozelia Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Luong, Shannon Story, Dr. Gangoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
