Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Radabaugh v. Augusta Business Daily, LLC
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shirley Radabaugh
Defendant:
Augusta Business Daily, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Laub v. Chosun Daily News Atlanta, LLC
as 1:2023cv03708
Plaintiff:
Gillian Laub
Defendant:
Chosun Daily News Atlanta, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Geddis v. Morris et al
as 1:2023cv02927
Plaintiff:
Marquis Geddis
Defendant:
Harry Morris, Daily Express, Inc., John Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Smith-Spiers v. SGK Entertainment Group, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith-Spiers
Defendant:
SGK Entertainment Group, LLC doing business as The Daily Draft and Sean Daily
Peters v. Snipes et al
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Melissa Peters
Defendant:
Maurice A. Snipes, Snipes Brother Transportation, LLC, Daily Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ivory v. Hall, et al
as 1:2020cv03273
Defendant:
Sgt. Daily, Sgt. Wilson, S. Fallin and others
Plaintiff:
Estercardo Ivory
Consolidated Defendant:
CO3 Dorsey, Melody Maddox, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv03307
Defendant:
Sgt. Daily, CO3 Gray, Sgt. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Estercardo P. Ivory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Maddox et al
as 1:2020cv03306
Defendant:
Officer Gray, Sgt. Wilson, S. Fallin and others
Plaintiff:
Estercardo P. Ivory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Kemp et al
as 4:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Sheriff Jimmy McDuffie, Sheriff Cullen Talton and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Tate et al
as 1:2019cv00644
Defendant:
Sgt. Daily, Detention Officer Gereet, Sgt. Tate and others
Plaintiff:
LaMorris D. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
