Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Bryan Patterson v. CDCR, et al
as 22-16512
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN DAMON PATTERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, UNION SUPPLY DIRECT, WALKENHORST, Vendor and others
(HC) Patterson v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2022cv01049
Petitioner:
Bryan Damon Patterson
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryan Patterson v. Maurice Howard, et al
as 22-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN DAMON PATTERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MAURICE HOWARD, Facility Chaplain at KVSP, A. LEYVA, Appeals Coordinator at KVSP and JOHN DOE, Jewish Rabbi
(PC) Bryan D. Patterson v. Howard et al
as 1:2020cv00751
Defendant:
Maurice Howard and A. Leyva
Plaintiff:
Bryan Damon Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Vannoy
as 2:2020cv00712
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Plaintiff:
Damon Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Patterson v. Forbes
as 2:2018cv02588
Plaintiff:
Bryan Damon Patterson
Defendant:
T. Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Spearman et al
as 2:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Bryan Damon Patterson
Defendant:
M. Spearman, C. Fackrell, V. Zumpano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Zewert et al
as 3:2017cv06914
Plaintiff:
Bryan Damon Patterson
Defendant:
Thomas Zewert, Fernando Tuvera, Law San Fu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Zewert et al
as 2:2017cv02446
Plaintiff:
Bryan Damon Patterson
Defendant:
Thomas Zewert, Fernando Tuvera, Law San Fu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Patterson v. City of Vallejo, et al
as 16-16939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN DAMON PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF VALLEJO, CA, VERIPIC, INC., ANDREW GANZ, Deputy District Attorney of Solano County California and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
