Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Baptiste, M.D. v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Wagner Baptiste, M.D.
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Jerri Curtis, M.D., Hawaii Health System Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brinkman et al v. Ong et al
as 3:2016cv00699
Defendant:
AMC Properties, Arbor Creek Apartments, Bittner-Hahs Law Firm and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Brinkman and Tanya Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dan Brinkman v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 13-36042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN BRINKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TAX DIVISION
Brinkman v. Internal Revenue Service(IRS), et al
as 3:2013cv01434
Plaintiff:
Dan Brinkman
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service(IRS) and US Department of Justice Tax Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brinkman v. Ross et al
as 3:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
Dan Brinkman
Defendant:
Dermatology Associates PC and Dr. Marla M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Brinkman v. Grant et al
as 3:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
Dan Brinkman
Defendant:
Troy Cunningham, FBI, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dan Brinkman v. Liberty Tax Service, et al
as 11-35050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN BRINKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LIBERTY TAX SERVICE, JOHN HEWITT, CEO of Liberty Tax, FOX NEWS NETWORK and others
Brinkman v. Leatherwood et al
as 3:2010cv01133
Plaintiff:
Dan Brinkman
Defendant:
Just Us (Organization)
Just U:
David Leatherwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
