Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bogard et al v. Falkenberg et al
as 5:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Ezekiel Perez, Shannon Walker, Kandy L. Benavides and others
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Daniel Perez-Hernandez and Rebecca Nicole Bogard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2020cv03053
Petitioner:
Daniel Perez, Daniel Junior Olveraperez and Daniel Olveraperez, Jr
Respondent:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2020cv01697
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Plaintiff:
Daniel Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
System Beauty LLC et al v Dallas Waste Disposal & Recycling Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01463
Plaintiff:
System Beauty LLC and Colormetrics LLC
Defendant:
Dallas Waste Disposal & Recycling Inc , Daniel's trading LLC , Richard Szarkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hamilton v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2016cv00964
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
United States Of America, State Of Texas, Harris County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Monsivais et al v. C & D Groceries, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv02754
Plaintiff:
Adrian C Monsivais , Delia Lopez , Lazaro Monsivais and others
Defendant:
C & D Groceries Inc and Daniel Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hill et al v. Perez et al
as 3:2010cv01440
Plaintiff:
Charles Elliot Hill, II , Charles E. Hill and Hill & Hill Petroleum, LLC
Defendant:
Charles Daniel Perez , Misty Perez , Perez Family Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv00982
Petitioner:
Daniel Perez
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Duke
as 7:2009cv00112
Petitioner:
Mark Daniel Perez
Respondent:
David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
