Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
SANTOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19032
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SANTOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANTOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04757
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SANTOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santos v. Finkelstein-Timberger LLC
as 7:2023cv04934
Plaintiff:
Daniel Santos
Defendant:
Finkelstein-Timberger LLC and Finkelstein-Timberger LLC doing business as Finkelstein-Morgan Agency
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
GRAVES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14673
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SANTOS GRAVES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Villalobos Sorto v. Garland
as 22-102
Petitioner:
DANIEL SANTOS VILLALOBOS SORTO and IVAN ADALBERTO VILLALOBOS ZELAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Frank Kenney, III v. Christopher Porrino, et al
as 21-2043
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO, SAMUEL VIAVATTINE, JERRY MARKUSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK J. KENNEY, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
