Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 23-1087
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Lisa Fitzpatrick, sued in their individual and official capacities., Nigel Marks, sued in their individual and official capacities. and others
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv05406
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
The City of New York, Lisa Fitzpatrick, Nigel Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc.
as 23-654
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
Urban Pathways, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities, Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, being sued in their individual and official capacities, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09080
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
Urban Pathways, Inc., Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 22-2025
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Nicola Aaronson, Kayla Arslanian and others
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 22-501
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Nicola Aaronson, Kayla Arslanian and others
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv11115
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
The City of New York, Nicloa Aaronson, Kayla Arslanian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Tietz v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03381
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tietz
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
