Cases 1 - 10 of 703
Acocella v. McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce et al
as 3:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Acocella
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, US Bank Trust National Association, Terry Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodio et al v. Raposo et al
as 3:2024mc00065
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Rodio and Leonardo Rodio
Defendant:
Daniel P. Raposo and RPM Homes, LLC
Rodio et al v. Raposo et al
as 3:2024mc00066
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Rodio and Leonardo Rodio
Defendant:
Daniel P. Raposo and RPM Homes, LLC
Hinton v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Jordan Hinton
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Daniel Dougherty, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Newkirk v. Wong et al
as 3:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Newkirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Danielle Wong, Paul Hammick, Zackary Klomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Danny Dermill Daniels, Kariem Quadir Muhammud, James Jamuel Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Officer, City of Denver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Dane Daniel Tilley
Defendant:
Scott Semple, P. Pelzar, L. Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Raeshon Kenneth Daniels
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept. of Correction, Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
