Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Biton v. Prime Minister of Israel et al
as 1:2012cv05234
Defendant:
AFA, AFL-CIO, ALPA and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biton v. NYCTA/MTA
as 1:2012cv02686
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Defendant:
NYCTA/MTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Beraka v. Biton et al
as 1:2012cv03705
Plaintiff:
George Beraka
Defendant:
Crystal Biton and Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Beraka v. Biton et al
as 1:2011cv09146
Plaintiff:
Dr. George Beraka
Defendant:
Crystal Biton and Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Redford v. Chicago Title Insurance Compan
as 11-4255
Plaintiff:
Saphyre Redford
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danielle Biton
Defendant:
East Bank
Defendant - Appellee:
Chicago Title Insurance, Fidelity Insurance, MOHR and others
Biton v. Grier
as 11-4271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danielle Biton, American Spelling, AKA Danielle Bitton, British Spelling
Defendant - Appellee:
Wilmer Hill Grier, Felix Ngati, Eliott Sutton and others
BITON et al v. UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
as 2:2011cv05106
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BITON, CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON and DANIELLE BITON
Defendant:
UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, DWECK, ADRIANNE MAIDENBAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDFORD et al v. ABRUTYN et al
as 2:2011cv05130
Plaintiff:
SAPHYRE REDFORD, DANIELLE BITON and CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON
Defendant:
MORGAN MELHUISH ABRUTYN, ED DWECK, KATHLEEN CARLA ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biton et al v. Clinton et al
as 1:2011cv06160
Plaintiff:
Charlene Michelle Biton, Crystal Biton, Moore Redford and others
Defendant:
Hillary Clinton, United States Of America, Michael Cardozo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biton v. United Airlines, et al.
as 11-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danielle Biton
Defendant - Appellee:
United Airlines, AFA, Federal Bureau Investigation New York Division and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
