Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. v. MWT ND OPS LLC d/b/a Monarch Waste Technologies
as 1:2023cv14203
Plaintiff:
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc.
Defendant:
MWT ND OPS LLC d/b/a Monarch Waste Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CYNTOX MEDASSURE LLC v. DANIELS SHARPSMART, INC
as 3:2023cv04365
Plaintiff:
CYNTOX MEDASSURE LLC
Defendant:
DANIELS SHARPSMART, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. v. Cyntox Limited Liability Company
as 1:2023cv03536
Plaintiff:
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc.
Defendant:
Cyntox Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. v. Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute
as 1:2019cv02370
Defendant:
Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, a Florida Limited Liability Company and Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute
Plaintiff:
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc., a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELS SHARPSMART, INC. v. BIO-HAZ SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2016cv04965
Plaintiff:
DANIELS SHARPSMART, INC.
Defendant:
BIO-HAZ SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: John V. McDermott, Jr. v. n
as 16-3637
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIELS SHARPSMART, INC.
Defendant:
COMPREHENSIVE WASTE STREAM CONSULTING LLC
Interested Party - Appellant:
JOHN V. MCDERMOTT, JR.
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. v. Comprehensive Waste Stream Consulting LLC et al
as 1:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc.
Defendant:
Comprehensive Waste Stream Consulting LLC and Gary McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barry Jay Kesselman LLC et al v. Daniels Sharpsmart Pty Ltd et al
as 3:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Barry Jay Kesselman LLC and Barry Jay Kesselman
Defendant:
Daniels Sharpsmart Pty Ltd, Daniels Sharpsmart Pty Ltd, Daniels Sharpsmart Pty Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
