Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Foster v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and Joseph Headley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Foster v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, John Q. Hamm, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster, Sr. v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00874
Petitioner:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Joseph Headley, John Hamm, ADOC Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Ivey et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Kay Ivey, Randolph County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00711
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Alabama Department of Corrections and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foster v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00522
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Kay Ivey and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2017cv02001
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster
Defendant:
Jenkins, Young, Eddie Watts and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
