Cases 1 - 10 of 62
(PC) Williams v. LaCoursier et al
as 2:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
David Earl Williams
Defendant:
Mark LaCoursier, Ashad Ali, Samer Hammoudeh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Williams v. Michael Martel
as 22-16370
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID EARL WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden
USA v. David Williams, et al
as 22-10174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID KAPONE WILLIAMS, MARCELL DEMETRIUS GRAY, SHAWMAINE EUSTACE ARDELL MOORE and others
Williams v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
David G Williams
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Bonner v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv00758
Plaintiff:
Joe Cummings Bonner, Jr.
Defendant:
David Pell Williams and Heather Demary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00504
Petitioner:
David V. Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Williams, Jr. v. DOJ, et al
as 19-16077
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLEY HARRINGTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID VERDEN WILLIAMS, Jr.
Korey Aarstad, et al v. BNSF Railway Company, et al
as 19-35305
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT A. ALBERT, JOEL B. HEFTY, KENNETH L. DRAKE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and JOHN SWING
David Williams, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 19-15627
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLEY HARRINGTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID VERDEN WILLIAMS, Jr.
David Williams, Jr. v. USA
as 19-70371
Petitioner:
DAVID VERDEN WILLIAMS, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
