Cases 1 - 10 of 19
United States of America v. Novoselsky et al
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
David Alan Novoselsky and Charmain J Novoselsky
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Novoselsky et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky and Charmain J Novoselsky
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice Tax Division, Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Novoselsky v. Larkin et al
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Defendant:
Jerome Larkin, Scott Renfroe and Benjamin Borougf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Novoselsky v. Larkin et al
as 1:2021cv03117
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Defendant:
Jerome Larkin, Scott Renfroe and Benjamin Borough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David A. Novoselsky, et al v. CIR
as 20-2644
Petitioner:
CHARMAIN J. NOVOSELSKY and DAVID A. NOVOSELSKY
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Klein v. Novoselsky et al
as 1:2017cv07177
Defendant:
Daniel M. Locallo, MB Financial Bank, N.A., Greyhound Lines, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tiberiu Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall Spiegel v. G. Michael Halfenger
as 17-2760
Petitioner:
MARSHALL SPIEGEL
Respondent:
G. MICHAEL HALFENGER
Party-in-Interest:
DAVID A. NOVOSELSKY, VIRGINIA E. GEORGE and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
Novoselsky v. Spiegel et al
as 2:2017cv00477
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Defendant:
Marshall Spiegel, John S Xydakis, Neil R Meccia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Novoselsky v. Zvunca et al
as 2:2017cv00427
Defendant:
Cristina Zvunca, Jeanine L Stevens and F John Cushing, III
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Marshall Spiegel v. G. Michael Halfenger
as 16-3998
Petitioner:
MARSHALL SPIEGEL
Respondent:
G. MICHAEL HALFENGER
Party-in-Interest:
DAVID A. NOVOSELSKY, VIRGINIA E. GEORGE and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
