Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ELLIOTT v. GEHRET et al
as 2:2020cv06331
Defendant:
(?)(PHILADELPHIA PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE), ERIC ZUCKERMAN, DAVID C. SHUTER and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL LEROY ELLIOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATILAND v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2019cv04130
Respondent:
JUDGE DAVID C. SHUTER, WARDEN JOHN DELANEY, WILLIAM BARR and others
Petitioner:
CHARLES MATILAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PALMER v. SHUTER et al
as 2:2017cv04954
Petitioner:
ROBERT THOMAS PALMER
Respondent:
DAVID C. SHUTER, FRANK T. BRADY, STEWART SCHUMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT et al
as 2:2015cv05681
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. SHUTER et al
as 2:2015cv05429
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID C. SHUTER, MARSHA NEIFIELD, SHEILA WOODS-SKIPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Parker v. Jewell Williams, et al
as 15-3266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEWELL WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA SHERIFF OFFICE, SHEILA WOODS-SKIPPER and others
Jason Parker v. Sam Haaz, et al
as 15-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM HAAZ, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DAVID C. SHUTER, JUDGE, PERRY DEMARCO and others
Jason Parker v. Thomas Del Ricci, et al
as 15-3267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER, MR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, JUDGE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE, RISA V. FURMAN, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY and others
PARKER v. SHUTER et al
as 2:2015cv05188
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID C. SHUTER, MEANS, MCCLENDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. SHUTER et al
as 2:2015cv05168
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID C. SHUTER, SETH WILLIAMS, SAM HAAZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
