Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02367
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Payne v. Bryant et al
as 1:2016cv00388
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Marshall Fisher, Jacquelyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Payne v. Phil Bryant, et al
as 15-60638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. PAYNE, 42 U.S.C.A. Section 2101 ADA Disabled Jewish Prisoner Hostage All Others Like Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BRYANT, MARSHALL FISHER, RAYMOND T. BYRD and others
Payne v. Bryant et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Marshall Fisher, Raymond T. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Payne v. ACA, et al
as 14-60163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT THORNTON, PATRICIA G. BERRY, in her individual capacity and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Payne v. American Corr Asstd, et al
as 13-60249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONS ASSOCIATION, RONALD REID WELCH, MARGARET BINGHAM and others
David Payne v. ACA, et al
as 12-60382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONS ASSOCIATION and RONALD REID WELCH
Payne v. ACA et al
as 3:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
ACA, M.D.O.C., Ronald Reid Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Payne v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner
as 11-60257
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID E PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Payne v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
