Cases 31 - 40 of 41
David Benner v. Michigan Parole Board, et al
as 08-1634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID G. BENNER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, S. RUBITSCHUN JOHN, JAMES ATTERBERRY and others
Brown v. Mills et al
as 2:2008cv02139
Petitioner:
Derrick LaKeith Brown
Respondent:
Marcel Mills, Jeremy Hensley, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Antonio Bonds v. David Mills
as 08-5120
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO BONDS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID G. MILLS, Warden, Warden
Wright v. Gorcyca et al
as 2:2008cv10045
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
David G Gorcyca and Michael Warren
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Derrick LaKeith Brown v. USA et al
as 2:2007cv02775
Petitioner:
Derrick LaKeith Brown
Respondent:
USA, Jon P. McCalla, J. Daniel Breen and others
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benner #313057 v. Howes
as 1:2007cv01059
Petitioner:
David G. Benner #313057
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Mills
as 3:2007cv00652
Petitioner:
Eric Bernard Howard
Respondent:
David G. Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benner #313057 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2007cv00569
Plaintiff:
David G. Benner #313057
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benner v. Carrill, et al
as 4:2007cv11606
Plaintiff:
David G. Benner
Defendant:
Richard Carrill, Peggy Patten and Jim Conner
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Garrett v. Mills et al
as 3:2007cv00352
Petitioner:
Aryan Ray Garrett
Respondent:
David G. Mills and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
