Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Adweek, LLC v. The Freeport Press, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00528
Defendant:
David Pilcher, The Freeport Press, Inc. and David G. Pilcher
Plaintiff:
Adweek, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendant
as 7:2020cv09229
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
David G gershman, Stelios kyriakides and marketing Consultants, lt kensho
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant and Unknown Plaintiff
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Latham et al v. The 1953 Trust et al
as 1:2020cv07102
Defendant:
Miramax, llc., Sir Philip Green, David Boise and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe (1-10), Tracey Y. Latham, Jane Doe (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huebner v. CenterState Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv03679
Defendant:
Jody Jean Dreyer, John C. Corbett, Charles W. McPherson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Huebner
Johnson v. CenterState Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv02905
Defendant:
Jody Jean Dreyer, John C. Corbett, Charles W. McPherson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson
Cooksey v. CenterState Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01709
Defendant:
Richard Murray IV, Jody Jean Dreyer, Michael J. Brown Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Grady Cooksey
Mabe v. CenterState Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv02683
Defendant:
Jody Jean Dreyer, John C. Corbett, Charles W. McPherson and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mabe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bonano v. Costello et al
as 9:2019cv00671
Defendant:
C.O. Mr. R. Chapin, Sgt. Vincent A. Costello, C.O. Keith Vincent and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gifford v. Thoms
as 9:2019cv00194
Petitioner:
David G. Gifford
Respondent:
M. Thoms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
