Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Thacker v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01073
Petitioner:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Respondent:
Governor Greg Abbott and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thacker, Junior v. Abbott et al
as 5:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Junior
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Governor Gregg Abbott and David Bruce Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Garcia et al
as 5:2023cv00906
Petitioner:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia, U.S. District Judge Fred Biery, U.S. District Judge Jason K. Pulliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
David Kent Fitch
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Thacker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv00363
Petitioner:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thacker v. Davis
as 5:2020cv00201
Petitioner:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thacker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2016cv00880
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
