Cases 31 - 40 of 97
David Kissi v. Thomas Simmons, et al
as 09-5301
Petitioner - Appellant:
David Kissi
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas Simmons, Special Agent, U.S. Department of Justice/FBI, Christine Barrilla-Nell, Esquire, U.S. Small Business Administration, Allan Stephenson, U.S. Small Business Administration and others
KISSI v. MEAD et al
as 1:2009cv01618
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MEAD, MICHAEL SCHATZOW, MICHAEL HECHT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: In Re: David Kissi, et al
as 09-3425
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Respondent:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOSEPH J. FARNAN, JR.
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
KISSI v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2009cv01452
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
THOMAS SIMMONS, CHRISTINE BARRILLA-NELL, ALLAN STEPHENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KISSI v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2009cv01377
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
THOMAS SIMMONS, CHRISTINE BARRILLA-NELL, ALLAN STEPHENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 8:2009cv01934
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Kissi v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 09-7077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Kissi
Defendant - Appellee:
EMC Mortgage Corporation, David Panzer and Joseph V. Buonassissi, II
KISSI v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2009cv01304
Petitioner:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
THOMAS SIMMONS
Respondent:
CHRISTINE BARRILLA-NELL, ALLAN STEPHENSON, SHARON GURNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
