Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Butts v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv01918
Plaintiff:
James Charles Butts
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, David Pavlakovic, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Pavlakovic et al
as 7:2017cv01701
Plaintiff:
Jamal Wilson
Defendant:
David Pavlakovic, Sharon Kurt and Patsy Clabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Corizon, LLC et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00646
Plaintiff:
James Charles Butts
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, David Pavlakovic, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeigler v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 7:2016cv01682
Plaintiff:
Herman Zeigler
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, David Pavlakovic, Sharon Kirk and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeigler v. Corizon Health Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00747
Plaintiff:
Herman Zeigler
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, David Pavlakovic, Sharon Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Corizon Medical Service et al
as 6:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
A C Glover
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Service, David Pavlakovic, Clabo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Pavlakovic et al
as 7:2014cv02428
Plaintiff:
Derek Clay
Defendant:
David Pavlakovic, Corizon and Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Walker v. David Pavlakovic, et al
as 14-12356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PAVLAKOVIC, MICHELLE SNEDEKER and MR. WHEAT
Walker v. Pavlakovic et al
as 4:2014cv00659
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Walker
Defendant:
David Pavlakovic, Michelle Snedeker and Mr. Wheat
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luker v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 4:2013cv01568
Plaintiff:
Clarence Luker
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Jean Darbouze, Anissa Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
