Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anderson v. Whittington et al
as 2:2022cv14247
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Anderson
Defendant:
Dan Whittington, Greg Forless, David Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTATE OF GLEN MITCHELL HAND v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2020cv00066
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA, FRANCIS DUCOSIN ONG, JUAN SANTIAGO and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF GLEN MITCHELL HAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrimmon et al v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Defendant:
K. MCCARTER, L. SWANSON, Tamara Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Caron Dettmann and Sarah McCrimmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2018cv01595
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01242
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv24567
Plaintiff:
Juan David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2013cv62756
Plaintiff:
Juan David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sapp v. Vanvuren et al
as 6:2009cv01228
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp
Defendant:
Warren D. Vanvuren, Can Puer, David Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2007cv00366
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
