Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Lester Lutz v. David Varano, et al
as 14-1004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER NELSON LUTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID VARANO and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS v. VARANO et al
as 2:2013cv06684
Petitioner:
SHAURN THOMAS
Respondent:
DAVID VARANO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gabriel Gonzalez v. David Varano, et al
as 13-3858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID VARANO and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
JENNINGS v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2013cv05227
Petitioner:
DONALD JENNINGS
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson Kirk v. David Varano
as 13-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELSON KIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID VARANO, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KANDIS DASCANI and others
Bailey et al v. Foulds et al
as 3:2013cv01743
Plaintiff:
Denise Bailey, Jayeneca Bailey, Jamie Meyers and others
Defendant:
Renee Foulds, Brad Ritchey, Lisa Kernsbarr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Varano et al
as 1:2013cv01733
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pearson
Defendant:
David Varano, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon v. Custer et al
as 1:2013cv01497
Plaintiff:
Tyrik Vernon
Defendant:
Charles Custer, John Wetzel, David Varano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPMAN v. VARANO et al
as 2:2013cv02995
Petitioner:
RONALD CHAPMAN
Respondent:
DAVID VARANO and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricardo Campos v. David Varano, et al
as 13-2480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO CAMPOS
Defendant:
DAVID VARANO and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
