Cases 1 - 8 of 8
David Noble, Jr. v. National Association of Letter Carriers, et al
as 23-7012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David W. Noble, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO, Alamo Branch 421 and Branch 9 NALC
NOBLE v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTERS CARRIERS
as 1:2022cv01613
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. NOBLE
Defendant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTERS CARRIERS, ALAMO BRANCH 421 and BRANCH 9 NALC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HOUFF et al v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, AFL-CIO
as 1:2017cv01255
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HOUFF and DAVID W. NOBLE, JR.
Defendant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
David Noble, Jr. v. William Dunn, Jr., et al
as 17-7024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David W. Noble, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
William M. Dunn, Jr., Director of Life Insurance, Lawrence G. Hutchins, Vice President, National Association of Letter Carriers, Michael J. O'Connor, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer, National Association of Letter Carriers and others
David Noble v. Samsung Electronics America In
as 16-1903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. NOBLE, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC
NOBLE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2015cv03713
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. NOBLE
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noble, David W. v. Sombrotto, Vincent, et al
as 06-7170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David W. Noble, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Vincent R. Sombrotto, President, National Association of Letter Carriers, Walter E. Couillard, Director, NALC Retiree Members, George N. Davis, Jr., Director, Safety and Health and others
NOBLE v. SOMBROTTO, et al
as 1:1994cv00302
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. NOBLE, JR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. DUNN, JR. , LAWRENCE G. HUTCHINS , MICHAEL J. O'CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
