Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Carter v. Cobb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Davita Carter
Defendant:
Cobb County Sheriff's Department, Residence at Riverside Row LLC and Danita Rozelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Total Renal Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02221
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, Davita Health Solutions, L.L.C., Total Renal Care, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Highlands at Sugarloaf et al v. Choi
as 1:2019cv01126
Plaintiff:
Woodward Management Partners and Highlands at Sugarloaf
Defendant:
Davita Choi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Anderson v. Emory Transplant Clinic et al
as 1:2018cv01171
Plaintiff:
Al-Rufus Anderson
Defendant:
Emory Transplant Clinic, Davita Dialysis, Mark Keifer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Downs v. Davita RX, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Amber N. Downs
Defendant:
Davita RX, LLC, Davita Accountable Care Solutions, LLC and Davita Medical Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
DAVITA INC. v. ST. JOSEPH'S/CANDLER HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
as 4:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
DAVITA INC.
Defendant:
ST. JOSEPH'S/CANDLER HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Studyvent v. Davita Accountable Care Solutions,LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02161
Plaintiff:
Lateasha Studyvent
Defendant:
Davita Accountable Care Solutions,LLC and Davita RX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Petsmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01564
Plaintiff:
Davita Smith
Defendant:
Petsmart, Inc. and John Doe
Debtor:
Petsmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
