Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Watkins v. Total Renal Care, Inc. DaVita Inc.
as 1:2023cv13944
Plaintiff:
Janette Watkins
Defendant:
Total Renal Care, Inc. DaVita Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Newsome v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Lisa N Newsome
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and DaVita Inc Long Term Disability Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Pena v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03803
Plaintiff:
Alberto Pena
Defendant:
Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC, SCAI Holdings, LLC, UnitedHealth Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Johnson v. Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01468
Plaintiff:
Gloria Johnson
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and Davita, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Howard v. Renal Life Link Inc., d/b/a DaVita, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03225
Plaintiff:
Demitria Howard
Defendant:
Renal Life Link Inc., d/b/a DaVita, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
