Cases 1 - 10 of 203
MCALEER v. DAVOL INC.
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. MCALEER
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and BARD SHANNON LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
WILKINSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv05679
Plaintiff:
SABRINA WILKINSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC., ETHICON, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PEVETO v. ETHICON CORPORATION, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01941
Plaintiff:
BURL A. PEVETO
Defendant:
ETHICON CORPORATION, INC., C.R. BARD, ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MEADOWS v. ETHICON INC. et al
as 3:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
TERRI E. MEADOWS
Defendant:
ETHICON INC., JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-100, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mundine v. ETHICON, INC et al
as 2:2020cv15878
Defendant:
DAVOL INC., GETINGE AB, MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Mundine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUNDINE v. ETHICON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv15878
Defendant:
DAVOL INC., GETINGE AB, MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MUNDINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZIMMERMAN v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00218
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., RODOLFO ARREOLA, M.D., JAY J. KIESSLING, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
RAY ZIMMERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv07240
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROY DEAN and ALCY DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv07248
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARIA GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARNEY et al v. BARD DAVOL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv16254
Defendant:
BARD DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
DON G. GARNEY and JUDY A. GARNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
