Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Negaard et al
as 1:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Jessica Purdy, Holly Negaard, Jessica Shanafelt and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Hoff v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Heather Davis, Anthony Holly and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Schroeder et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Tammy Schroeder, Jesse Thompson, Randy McGonigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Morse et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Doug Morse, Captain Ebach, Shannon Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
David Michael Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Schuh et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh and Adam S. Hamilton
Defendant:
Governor Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians et al v. Jaeger
as 3:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, Spirit Lake Tribe, Wesley Davis and others
Defendant:
Alvin Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
