Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Earl Million v. Dawn Grounds, et al
as 15-41444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL RAYMOND MILLION
Defendant - Appellee:
DAWN E. GROUNDS, FNU NEAL, FNU CHOAT and others
Sanchez v. GROUNDS et al
as 5:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Sanchez
Defendant:
DAWN E GROUNDS, Wade Alexander, JEFFREY K. CALFEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Million v. GROUNDS et al
as 5:2014cv00011
Plaintiff:
Earl Raymond Million
Defendant:
DAWN E GROUNDS, FNU Neal, FNU Choat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv04735
Plaintiff:
Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID, Mr. Summers, Ms. Angie Ricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eduardo Sanchez v. Shaylon Allen, et al
as 13-41247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDUARDO SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAYLON ALLEN, Ad. Seg Captain, JAMES POWERS, Ad. Seg Major, DAWN E. GROUNDS, Warden and others
Cheyenne Pate v. Dawn Grounds, et al
as 13-40764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHEYENNE PATE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN DAWN E. GROUNDS, SERGEANT KELLY MAY, CAPTAIN WILLIAM D GADDIS, JR. and others
Sanchez v. Allen et al
as 5:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Sanchez
Defendant:
Shaylon Allen, James Powers, DAWN E GROUNDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pate v. GROUNDS et al
as 5:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne Pate
Defendant:
DAWN E GROUNDS, Kelly May, William D Gaddis, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brooks v. GROUNDS
as 6:2012cv00336
Petitioner:
Charles David Brooks
Respondent:
Dawn E. Grounds and RICK C THALER
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. GROUNDS
as 6:2012cv00312
Petitioner:
Charles David Brooks
Respondent:
Dawn E. Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
