Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caplan v. K.A.M. AUTO PARTS INC. et al
as 1:2022cv20728
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
K.A.M. AUTO PARTS INC. and INVESTMENTS DC LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barberi v. DC Vending Discount Equipment Distributors Parts & Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv25136
Defendant:
ALBERTO S. CHVIECH and DC VENDING DISCOUNT EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS PARTS & SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Caplan v. SOUTH FLORALS DC, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv23379
Defendant:
SOUTH FLORALS DC, LLC and RSN PROPERTIES DC, LLC
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Caplan v. SOUTH FLORALS DC, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv20502
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
SOUTH FLORALS DC, LLC and MARINER CAPITAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv22739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
HARPER v. US WASHINGTON DC et al
as 3:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
MONTOREY DANYELL HARPER
Defendant:
US WASHINGTON DC and UN NEW YORK NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DC v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
DC
Defendant:
State of Florida, The Florida Department of Children and Families, The Florida Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
