Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ecoshield Pest Solutions North DC LLC et al v. Dixon
as 2:2021cv01726
Plaintiff:
Ecoshield Pest Solutions North DC LLC, Shield Co Marketing LLC, Shield Companies LLC and others
Defendant:
Parker Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romero et al v. James River Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv00920
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-DC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Romero and Paige Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Danielle Kennedy et al
as 2:2019cv04304
Defendant:
Scotts DC LLC and Danielle Kennedy
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Danielle Kennedy et al
as 8:2019cv00957
Defendant:
Scotts DC LLC and Danielle Kennedy
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
SC Innovations, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv07440
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SC Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Sabatino v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jacob Sabatino
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Rasier-CA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shifman et al v. 800 DC, LLC, et al
as 5:2013cv05934
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Shifman , Goretti Shifman and Dry Cleaning Delivery Services, Inc.
Defendant:
800 DC, LLC , Kostopoulos Rodriguez, PLLC and K. Dino Kostopoulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blade Energy PTY LTD et al v. Olecram Investments LLC et al
as 8:2013cv00874
Plaintiff:
Blade Energy PTY LTD, Claire Energy PTY LTD, Northsun Resources PTY LTD and others
Defendant:
Does, JND DC LLC, David McGirt and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
