Cases 1 - 8 of 8
D'Angelo v. Six Unknown DEA Agents et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Carlo Robert D'Angelo
Defendant:
Six Unknown DEA Agents, One Unknown Amherst Police Officer, The Marriot Courtyard Hotel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Datta v. DEA Agents et al
as 1:2021cv02494
Defendant:
Miguel Carrera, Hon. Andrew J. Peck, John Post and others
Plaintiff:
Vikram Datta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Etienne v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00613
Defendant:
Unknown U.S. Transportation Security Administration Officer, United States of America and U.S. DEA Agent Antonio LoGrande
Plaintiff:
Keddins Etienne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Tavarez et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00244
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 (names and number of whom are unknown at present), United States Drug Enforcement Administration, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Tavarez and Robert Batista Campusano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Diaz et al v. United States Drug Enforcement Agent James Lee et al
as 1:2014cv04108
Plaintiff:
Kristin Adams and Luis Diaz
Defendant:
DEA Agent John Doe, James Coe, Jane Doe and others
Names Being Fictitious But Intended To Represent The Presently Unknown DEA Agents Participating In T:
Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mikhaylov v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv02606
Respondent:
Thomas Harrigan, John Doe DEA Agents 1-10, Michele Leonhart and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Mikhaylov
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maye v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01260
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Maye
Defendant:
The State of New York, Joseph W. Bethel, P.O. Habshi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres-Cuesta v. Berberich et al
as 1:2008cv01382
Plaintiff:
Juliano Torres-Cuesta
Defendant:
Francis Berberich, Unknown DEA Agents, New York City Police Detectives and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
