Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Marshall v. Mason
as 2:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Marshall
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beggs v. Mason
as 1:2024cv03002
Petitioner:
Forrest Arthur Beggs
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Wise et al
as 4:2023cv05143
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill and Robert J Hill
Defendant:
Todd Wise, Jon Coers, Aaron Kershaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv05773
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Cook
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Wentworth, Leigh Gilliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Sinclair et al
as 3:2021cv05089
Defendant:
Michael Green, Stephen Sinclair, Medical Staff In Charge of Health Needs and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Leonard Cole and Richard Leonard Cole, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. White et al
as 3:2018cv05108
Plaintiff:
Bill Joe Lane
Defendant:
Daniel White, Dean Mason, John Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Davis v. Washington State Department of, et al
as 17-35943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH ADAIR DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Secretary and Assistant Secretary, G. HAMMOND, Medical Director, ADA COORDINATOR, WA State Dept of Corrections and others
Perry Mason v. USA
as 17-12295
Petitioner - Appellant:
PERRY DEAN MASON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wade v. Mason
as 2:2016cv01645
Petitioner:
Gary Anthony Wade
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Troupe v. Donna Smith, et al
as 16-35857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TROUPE
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA SMITH, SCOTT RUSSELL, ERIC WIRT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
