Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Saul v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03494
Plaintiff:
Dee Saul
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCune v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
as 2:2017cv15678
Plaintiff:
Dee McCune
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McSpadden v. Dees et al
as 3:2017cv01660
Defendant:
Travis Dees and Stevens Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shepard McSpadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Pope v. Stanley et al
as 6:2017cv01422
Plaintiff:
Brian L Pope
Defendant:
Dee Edward Stanley , Michael Dean Hebert and Lafayette Consolidated Government
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
Reed v. Torres et al
as 3:2017cv00511
Defendant:
James Best, City Counsel of New Roads, Joesph Dee gains and others
Plaintiff:
Ellis James Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knadler v. Army et al
as 6:2017cv00577
Plaintiff:
Dick Dee Knadler
Defendant:
Dept of Army, Robert M Speer, Army Board for Correction of Military Records and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Dean v. Akal Security Inc
as 1:2017cv00543
Defendant:
Akal Security Inc
Plaintiff:
Hayward Dean , Bruce Dupont , Gary L Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Grayson v. Wood Group PSN, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Jarvis J Grayson
Defendant:
Wood Group P S N Inc , M/V Miss Dee, Lafayette Marine L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Dees et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00030
Plaintiff:
Judy Dees , Charles Malcolm Dees , Darlene Dees Nash and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Richardson et al v. City of Shreveport et al
as 5:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Sarah L Richardson and Dee Jay Richardson
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, CB Cisco, D Albrecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
