Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tuttle v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Ladonna Dee Tuttle
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Treece v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kim Vivian Dee Treece
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Sharp
as 4:2020cv00380
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Tommy Sharp
Petitioner:
Billy Dee Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans et al v. Arvest Bank
as 4:2018cv00530
Plaintiff:
Boris Bernard and Vera Dee Evans
Defendant:
Arvest Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Springer v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00628
Plaintiff:
Kimberley Dee Springer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Deaton et al v. Carr et al
as 4:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
Eric Deaton , Natasha Brown , Roger Goforth and others
Defendant:
Elaine Carr , Larry Williams , Marty Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider v. Frasier, Frasier and Hickman L.L.P. et al
as 4:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
Karen Snider
Defendant:
Frasier, Frasier and Hickman L.L.P., Frank W Frasier, III, Jane Doe Frasier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Amateur Softball Association of America et al
as 4:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Trudy Gayle Henderson and Henderson and Dees, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Thomas v. Hendrick et al
as 4:2008cv00474
Plaintiff:
Micheal T Thomas and Micheal T Thomas
Defendant:
Howard H Hendrick, Richard L DeVaughn, Ronald L Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
