Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Dempsey v. Wells et al
as 6:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene Dempsey
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Lynch, RN-BSN Desera Roberts, Kelly Snell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dempsey v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01282
Plaintiff:
David Dempsey
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dempsey v. Brice, Vander Linden & Wernick, PC
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jack Dempsey
Defendant:
Brice, Vander Linden & Wernick, PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Dempsey et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2011cv04260
Plaintiff:
Juanita Dempsey and Emilia Deluna
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dempsey et al v. US Bank National Association et al
as 4:2010cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jack Dempsey and Sherri Dempsey
Defendant:
US Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Financial Federal Credit Inc. v. Jefferson Transport Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00879
Plaintiff:
Financial Federal Credit Inc.
Defendant:
Jefferson Transport Service, Inc. and Shirley Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutton v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00075
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Dempsey Sutton
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dempsey v. The Kroger Co
as 9:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Abigail Dempsey
Defendant:
The Kroger Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
