Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Paul Reif v. Denise Symdon
as 18-1979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL REIF
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE SYMDON
Daryl O. Norris v. Denise Symdon
as 18-1688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARYL O. NORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE SYMDON
Blunt v. Symdon et al
as 2:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Delond M Blunt
Defendant:
Denise Symdon, Grace Roberts and Rose Snyder-Spaar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Litsscher et al
as 2:2016cv01681
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Burke, Sr
Defendant:
Jon E Litsscher, David Melby, Lance Wiersma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reif, Paul et al v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00766
Plaintiff:
Paul Reif and Steven Boehm
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Denise Symdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Belleau v. Edward Wall, et al
as 15-3225
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. BELLEAU
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWARD F. WALL, Secretary of Wisconsin Department of Corrections and DENISE SYMDON, Administrator of Division of Community Corrections
Christopher Sanders v. Elizabeth Vargas, et al
as 12-2371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH VARGAS, Probation Agent, NEIL THORESON, Supervisor, SALLY TESS, Regional Chief and others
Christopher M. Sanders v. Elizabeth Vargas, et al
as 11-2207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH VARGAS, Probation Agent, NEIL THORESON, Supervisor, SALLY TESS, Regional Chief and others
Christopher M. Sanders v. Elizabeth Vargas, et al
as 11-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH VARGAS, Probation Agent, NEIL THORESON, Supervisor, SALLY TESS, Regional Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
