Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sellars v. EXP Realty LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04389
Plaintiff:
Antoinette C Sellars
Defendant:
EXP Realty LLC, Summit Funding, Prestige Partners Realty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brown v. Mr. Cooper
as 1:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brown
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper and Mr. Cooper formerly doing business as Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown v. Dart
as 1:2014cv05799
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brown
Defendant:
Tom J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv05276
Plaintiff:
David A. Russell
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Daniel Mauricee, Director Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael J. Zbierajewski Trust, The v. Ferro et al
as 1:2014cv02600
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Zbierajewski Trust , The
Defendant:
Michael J Ferro, Jr. , Jeffrey A. Surges , Justin C. Dearborn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pincon vs. Brown, et. al.
as 1:2014cv01304
Plaintiff:
Hubert C. Pincon
Defendant:
Dennis Brown , Matt Maloney , Michael W. Ferro, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Piphus et al v. City of Chicago of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv07259
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Piphus and William Piphus
Defendant:
City of Chicago of Chicago Police Department, Rahm Emanuel, Garry F McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 247
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv04029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
