Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Satish Shetty v. Eric H Holder Jr et al
as 8:2010cv01036
Respondent:
Lee Baca, Dennis Burns, David O. Carter and others
Petitioner:
Satish Shetty
Jia Xing Wang v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv07332
Respondent:
Lee Baca, Dennis Burns, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04342
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04328
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04331
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ciampi v City of Palo Alto, et al
as 5:2009cv02655
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ciampi and Joseph Ciampi
Defendant:
City of Palo Alto, Lynne Johnson, Dennis Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03661
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03538
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Contemporary Distribution, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02250
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
Contemporary Distribution, Inc., Contemporary Management Co., Dennis Burns and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
