Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Turnage v. Mississippi Power
as 23-60154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ray C. Turnage, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Reverend D. Franklin Browne, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Dennis D. Henderson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Sam Britton, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner, Cecil Brown, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner, Brandon Presley, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner and others
Turnage v. Britton
as 21-60130
Defendant / Appellee:
Cecil Brown, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner, Sam Britton, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner, Mississippi Power Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reverend D. Franklin Browne, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Ray C. Turnage, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Charles Bartley, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Turnage et al v. Britton et al
as 3:2018cv00818
Plaintiff:
Juanita J. Griggs, Clarence Magee, Chernise Seaphus and others
Defendant:
Cecil Brown, Brandon Presley, Sam Britton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Kenneth Fairley, Sr., et al v. Hattiesburg Mississippi, et al
as 15-60637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REVEREND KENNETH E. FAIRLEY, SR., REVEREND D. FRANKLIN BROWNE, DENNIS D. HENDERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HATTIESBURG MISSISSIPPI, HATTIESBURG MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, HATTIESBURG MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Fairley et al v. Hattiesburg, Mississippi et al
as 2:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Fairley, Sr. , D. Franklin Browne , Dennis D. Henderson and others
Defendant:
Hattiesburg, Mississippi , Hattiesburg Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee, Hattiesburg, Mississippi Republican Executive Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
