Cases 21 - 30 of 278
BROTHERS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROTHERS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK v. BALLENGER et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
J. D. BALLENGER, DENNIS REAGLE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. INTERNOLL INVESTIGATIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
JACOB BRIER
Defendant:
INTERNOLL INVESTIGATIONS and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Neeb v. Dennis Reagle
as 24-1036
Petitioner:
WILLIAM RAY NEEB
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE, Warden
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGINNIS v. MANNING et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY J. MCGINNIS
Defendant:
MANNING, MCCAFFERTY, BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
SETH VILCHUCK
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
