Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Perales v. State of California et al
as 1:2011cv01219
Defendant:
State of California, California Unemployment Development Department, California Unemployment Development Department - Tax Office Anaheim CA and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Attorney General Eric Holder
as 1:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
Beverly Prather
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Bango v. State of Delaware Department of Justice
as 1:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Noel K. Bango
Defendant:
State of Delaware Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Superior Court et al v. El
as 1:2009cv00912
Plaintiff:
Superior Court, John A. Parkins, Jr., Joseph R. Slights, III and others
Defendant:
Dykym El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mendez v. US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit et al
as 1:2007cv00456
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, US Attorney General, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit et al
as 1:2007cv00450
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, US Attorney General, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Delaware Department of Justice Victim/Witness Services et al
as 1:2007cv00246
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Alston, Jr.
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Justice Victim/Witness Services, Delaware Justice of the Peace Court, Parrott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Roy v. USA et al
as 1:2006cv00685
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
USA, New York City, New York, George Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
