Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Witherspoon v. Consequence et al
as 1:2015cv05736
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Consequence, Lucrano the Boss, Young Bouncer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. Canada Federal Courts et al
as 1:2015cv05254
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Canada Federal Courts, Conde Nast, Forbes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. Paychex et al
as 1:2015cv05253
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Paychex, IRS, New York Liberty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. Raymour & Flanigan et al
as 1:2015cv04915
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Raymour & Flanigan, Sony Electronics, Honma Golf Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. Gortex et al
as 1:2015cv04667
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Gortex, Givenchy, H&M and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. CBS Interactive Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04571
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
CBS Interactive Inc., 20th Century Fox Television, Magic City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Witherspoon v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2015cv04329
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Shaniqua Tompkins, Frank Petitto, Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. Govonor's Office of Motion Picture and Television
as 1:2015cv04338
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Govonor's Office of Motion Picture and Television, West Coast Customs, East Coast Customs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Witherspoon v. Rivera et al
as 1:2015cv04328
Defendant:
Matthew Lawson, Terrane Thomas, Marvin Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WITHERSPOON v. REMAX LLC
as 2:2015cv02308
Plaintiff:
DESMOND M. WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
REMAX LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
