Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. Officer of the Desoto County, Mississippi Chancery Court et al
as 2:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Greg Brown
Defendant:
Officer of the Desoto County, Mississippi Chancery Court, Judge Mitchell M. Lundy, Misty Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Katherine Jefferson
Defendant:
DeSoto County, Mississippi, Bill Rasco, Desoto County, Mississippi Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Buchanan v. DeSoto County, Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Buchanan
Defendant:
DeSoto County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 0.55 Acre Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 0.55 Acre Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Kenneth Bowen, Jan R. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-Of-Way Over 3.94 Acres of Land, more or less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00108
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth Bank, Easements and Rights-Of-Way Over 3.94 Acres of Land, more or less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Golf, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Bradley K. Little and United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in DeSoto County, Mississippi and Linda B. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 2.84 Acres of Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 2.84 Acres of Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Joel I. Stewart and Linda B. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 1.27 Acres of Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00022
Defendant:
Wintrust Bank, An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 1.27 Acres of Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, CKT Properties, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
