Cases 1 - 10 of 41
(PC) Ross v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv01920
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Ray Ross
Defendant:
CDCR, Deuel Vocational Institution and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Covarrubis v. Deuel Vocational Institution et al
as 2:2020cv01193
Plaintiff:
Armando Covarrubis
Defendant:
CSP Lancaster, Kern Valley State Prison, Deuel Vocation Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution
as 2:2018cv00347
Plaintiff:
Ricky Paul Smith
Defendant:
Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poslof v. Deuel Vocational Institution et al
as 2:2017cv02422
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
Deuel Vocational Institution, Sable and G. Malet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Deuel Vocational Institution
as 2:2017cv00757
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Deuel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v Deuel Vocational Institution
as 2:2015cv02041
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Deuel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McZeal v. Zapata et al
as 2:2015cv01795
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. McZeal
Defendant:
Andres Zapata and Deuel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Deuel Vocational Institute et al
as 2:2015cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ardell Smith
Defendant:
Deuel Vocational Institute, California State Prison and Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearwester v. Scully et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee Dearwester
Defendant:
Jan Scully, Eric Kindall, Office of the District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearwester v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv00443
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee Dearwester
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison and Deuel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
